Application of AHP Method for Comparing the Criteria Used in Locating Wind Farms

Main Article Content

Alicja Stoltmann

Abstract

The article presents a description and comparison of criteria used for choosing the location of a wind farm. The criteria include measurements of wind kinetic energy on a given location, location of wind turbines, location of the transmission line which is used for power transfer from a wind farm to a substation, location of local infrastructure and a grid connection related with technical requirements and project environment. In order to compare the above mentioned criteria, the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method was used, with a 1 to 9 point scale. As far as matching preferences with criteria is concerned, it embraces issues of obtaining decisions and permissions. The main objective of the article is to create a ranking of criteria in their correlation to probability of project success. The article presents the introduction of comparative analysis of a few planned projects, with regard to the time needed to obtain construction permit.

Article Details

How to Cite
Alicja Stoltmann. (2016). Application of AHP Method for Comparing the Criteria Used in Locating Wind Farms. Acta Energetica, (03), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.52710/ae.402
Section
Articles

References

Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego

i Rady 2009/28/WE w sprawie promowania

stosowania energii ze źródeł odnawialnych

z 23 kwietnia 2009.

Saaty T.L., How to make a decision: The

Analytic Hierarchy Process, Eur. J. Oper.

Res., 1990.

Plazibat N., Babic Z., Ranking of enterprises

based on multicriterial analysis,

International Journal of Production

Economics 1998, No. 97, s. 29–35.

Downarowicz O. i in., Zastosowanie

metody AHP do oceny i sterowania

poziomem bezpieczeństwa złożonego

obiektu technicznego, Politechnika

Gdańska, 2000, s. 7–42.

Adamus W., Gręda A., Wspomaganie

decyzji wielokryterialnych w rozwiązywaniu

wybranych problemów organizacyjnych

i menedżerskich, Badania

Operacyjne i Decyzje 2005, Vol. 2,

No. 2, s. 5–36.